BTSR Blogs


    Ronald Crawford


    •  

    Politically Correct Translations

    Friday, November 19 2010 07:21:13 AM

    The New International Version (NIV) of the Bible is coming out with a new translation, a politically correct translation. 

    The latest NIV translation (2002) bombed because it used gender-neutral language: “brother and sisters” for “brothers” in the Greek when the original was inclusive of both men and women. 

    When the 2002 version debuted prominent conservative religious leaders, James Dobson and John Piper, boycotted the new translation claiming it distorted truth.

    After poor sales, the NIV is reinventing itself in a form that will surely respond to the criticism of conservatives.  Jay Phelan, professor at North Park Theological Seminary in Chicago suggests that the translators “buckled under pressure from conservatives.”  He went on to say, “The whole idea that we want to make this constituency or that constituency unhappy is wrong.  You don’t do a translation that way.  You don’t say ‘this will make the liberals unhappy’ or ‘this will make conservatives unhappy.’  Your job is to produce the most accurate translation possible.”

    Doug Moo, the lead translator, acknowledged the committee “researched to see what words evangelical Christians – who are most likely to buy the new NIV – prefer.”

    I want to make two simple points.  First, this is a great article to clip and save for Bible study programs with laity.  It will give laity information about the difficulty of translations in general; but will also provide information as to why the latest NIV is a politically correct translation.  Laity need to know the truth!  This article will help.

    Second, the article makes no bones about it: conservatives want a Bible that says what they want it to say.  The ultimate issue for them is not ‘What does the Bible say?’ but ‘Does the Bible support my theology?”  Conservatives want to read a Bible that puts women in their place – NIV translators have given it to them.

    Grace and Peace,

     

    PS.  “New Bible drops neutered language of ’02 version,” USA Today, 11/19/2010; found on their website.

    Tags:

    Congratulations to Mimi Walker

    Wednesday, November 17 2010 01:13:58 AM

    A few days ago the Georgia Baptist Convention declared the Druid Hills Baptist Church no longer a “cooperating church;” the church has a woman pastor.  Mimi and Graham Walker are co-pastors of the church.

    Congratulations to Mimi for answering God’s call.

    The Georgia Baptist Convention is guilty of transference.  Messengers are apparently upset and inappropriately blame Mimi and the good people of Druid Hills Baptist Church.  If messengers have a “beef” they need to direct their anger where it belongs; the messengers should have voted to withdraw fellowship from God.  God is the “bad guy” here.  Mimi is the Gospel messenger.  God is the one who started “the problem” in calling Mimi to pastoral ministry in the first place.

    Georgia Baptist missed the mark.  They should have voted God out!

    Congratulations to Mimi for staying the course and remaining faithful to her calling.  As a called one, Mimi’s responsibility is first to the One who called her into ministry.  In the face of mounting criticism from the very far right, Mimi has quietly gone about her ministry.  Have you read articles written by Mimi where she whines about the criticism she has been facing?  I don’t think so.  She is a trooper!  She served as a Southern Baptist Convention missionary for a dozen years – for heaven’s sake.  While others “bad-mouth” her, she goes about her ministry.  Good for her.

    Congratulations to Mimi for being a reasonable Baptist; there is another kind.  I grew up in sweet-spirited Virginia Baptist fundamentalism and some of that DNA remains in me.  But, the Georgia Baptist Convention’s actions reveal a small-minded, mean-spirited brand of fundamentalism that is profoundly out-of-touch with the Spirit.  While I respect brothers and sisters with very conservative perspectives, at times it is appropriate to call a spade a spade.

    Mimi is a splendid example of a minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  The action of the Georgia Baptist Convention is an embarrassment to the larger Christian family.

    There is no egg on Mimi’s face.  Georgia Baptists need a truck load of paper towels to clean up the mess on their faces.

    Grace and Peace,

    Tags:

    Lessons of the Great Recession

    Monday, November 15 2010 04:03:18 PM

    The Great Recession has created seismic shifts in religious life in America.  During the Exceedingly Long Recovery congregations need to pay careful attention to equations that describe our “new normal” or help pave the way forward.

    Low interest rates = reduced contributions from senior adults.

    Most senior adults live on fixed incomes, with declining disposable incomes.  As seniors age their medical costs rise.  Low interest rates reduce the income seniors derived from CDs and other financial instruments.  In addition, low interest rates tend to go hand-in-hand with very low inflation; keeping automatic Cost of Living (COL) increases for Social Security recipients low.  The COL increase for Social Security has been zero the last two years (unprecedented).  With medical expenses up and all sources of income either level or down, seniors will have less money to donate to churches --- for years to come.

    High unemployment = increased need for benevolent ministries.

    The unemployment rate is above 9.5%.  Typically economists think it takes GNP (Gross National Product) growth of 5%, or more, to diminish unemployment ranks.  GNP rose 1.7% last year.  It could be years before GNP grows by more than 5%.  This long economic recovery means the unemployment rate is going to continue at unprecedented levels for years to come; thus, the need for benevolent ministries will grow over the next three to five years.  Unfortunately, because of limited financial resources many churches will be unable to respond to the needs of their own communities.  This may require local congregations to reevaluate “mission funding” beyond the local church’s ministry.

    Weak housing market = entrenched ministers unwilling to move.

    Most ministers are hesitant to leave their present ministry – for financial reasons.  A church may offer a larger salary and a larger audience, but moving could destroy a minister’s finances.  With housing costs down, the minister’s home isn’t worth what it once was and it could take a long time to sell the minister’s house.  A ministers ‘balance sheet’ could take a terrible beating in this economy with a move; a $10,000 salary increase will be more than off-set with an extra house payment for eighteen months and substantial losses on selling a home.

    I tell churches these days, if you want a new pastor you may have to “pry” her from where she now lives.  It can be done, but churches will have to become creative.  Churches looking for pastors need to consider three adjustments.  First, the church should consider paying all closing costs associated with a minister selling or buying a home; this is the normal practice when businesses ask an employee to relocate.  While this may seem unusual for churches, we live in very unusual times.  Second, churches should consider paying for the new minister to live in an apartment for up to a year to help ease costs of the transition.  Third, congregations should first look for ministers serving in their own general geographical area.  Talented ministers are just a few miles down the road; churches in other states are pretty impressed with them.

    Successful Congregation = reduced costs

    The historic nature of the Great Recession requires a major shift in the way churches trim expenses.  In other recessions churches have just cut back on everything until the economy bounced back.  There will be no bounce this time and churches must look at more fundamental alterations.  The two largest costs for churches are personnel and costs associated with buildings, both need to be trimmed in this troubled economy.  In the case of personnel, churches need to outsource as much work as they can and reduce their number of employees.  Not every ministry position requires a seminary graduate.  Historically, church personal expenses have been 45% to 55% of the church’s operating budget.  Local churches need to move their personnel expenses to 40% of the operating budget as soon as feasible.  With regard to facilities, churches may want to consider leasing unused space to organizations with a similar mission.  “Sharing facilities” can significantly reduce costs.  Letting a building stand unused all week is a terrible “financial loss” for a church.

    Successful congregation = focused spending

    Where a church spends money is critical in hard economic times.  As noted above, historically churches in this country have ‘invested’ in personnel and buildings as an effective way of growing congregations.  The assumption has been that personnel and buildings grow ministries and services to people.  In hard economic times, churches tend to reduce program costs which leave personnel without money to spend on programs or without funds to keep the lights on in buildings.  Because of the protracted nature of these hard economic times, churches will be better served to reduce costs associated with personnel and buildings and substantially increase program costs.  “Free pizza,” debt counseling provided by members who are accountants and retraining and debt management courses will draw new members; not people who are good at public prayer.

    The world has changed.  The Great Recession and the Exceedingly Long Recovery have dramatically altered ministry funding for the next decade.  Churches need to “do the math” and adjust the way they do ministry.

    Grace and Peace,

    Tags:
    Baptist Theological Seminary at Richmond | 3400 Brook Road | Richmond, Virginia 23227  
    804-355-8135  |  Admissions: 888-345-BTSR (2877)
    © Copyright 2011 Baptist Theological Seminary at Richmond. All rights reserved